+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
09-05-2013 11:17 PM #1
nornal to have or not have gatecrash?
as wedding bell loom large, like to ask if it's ok not to have the gatecrashing?
having problem finding the required number of brothers and contemplating whether to skip the gatecrash to haf alternatives?
10-05-2013 09:23 AM #2
gatecrashing adds 'fun' to the whole process.. its something to let the groom knows it takes effort to win the bride..
if you think likewise, it is also ok not to have gatcrashing..
29-05-2013 02:38 PM #3
I am not having a gate crashing component as well. It's too hard and complicated.
03-06-2013 08:15 PM #4
I'm not going to have gatecrashing as well...
25-06-2013 06:40 PM #5
I gonna skip that part too... Keeping it simple but really depends on your families...
26-06-2013 01:34 PM #6
Just a question of your preference between fun and intimate.
21-10-2013 10:06 PM #7
One thing I would like to ask, for example, I have actually engaged a group of brothers, but all seems to be not very cooperative.. so thinking of dropping the whole gate crashing process or changing the group of brothers.. any one can advise?? Is there any superstitious belief to changing brothers?
22-10-2013 03:22 PM #8
having a gate crashing actually adds fun to your wedding but i think it's also alright not to have one if you want to have a really solemn and intimate ceremony.
24-01-2014 02:44 PM #9
it would depend on you. if you think that you already lack the time and the person that you need to prepare for a wedding then you might as well not proceed with it.